As the debate continues, users are navigating a complicated intersection of admiration for beloved animation styles and respect for artistic originality.
Studio Ghibli fans were excited when OpenAI recently upgraded ChatGPT, allowing anyone to turn photos into animations resembling the iconic style of Hayao Miyazaki. Social media quickly overflowed with Ghibli-inspired creations, from adorable pets and wedding moments to internet memes transformed into anime scenes reminiscent of films like Spirited Away and My Neighbor Totoro.
Yet beneath the surface of this viral trend is a growing controversy about the ethics and implications of AI-generated art. Hayao Miyazaki himself has previously expressed clear disdain for artificial intelligence in animation. In a 2016 documentary, Miyazaki famously described AI-generated animations as “an insult to life itself,” deeply criticizing technology that attempts to mimic genuine human expression.
Related story: New Ghibli Museum exhibit shines spotlight on the magic of hand-drawn background art
Related story: Now you won’t be needing a visa to get a taste of Studio Ghibli magic
Many artists echo Miyazaki’s concerns, arguing that their unique style is their identity, which cannot be replicated ethically without consent. According to a recent HBR article, training generative AI systems often involves large datasets containing copyrighted works. This practice raises complex questions about intellectual property infringement and fair use.
Jonathan Lam, a storyboard artist, told The New York Times, that style isn’t just a technique, it’s how artists differentiate themselves and secure opportunities. A report by non-profit organization, Copyright Alliance, echoes similar sentiments from graphic artists and illustrators, who stress that unauthorized training on their work undermines their careers and devalues human creativity. AI-generated art, they argue, diminishes their value and threatens their livelihoods.
Related story: The indefatigable Hayao Miyazaki and why ‘The Boy and the Heron’ is significant
Related story: What is DeepSeek, the AI startup that shook the tech world?
Despite these concerns, OpenAI maintains it does not permit direct imitations of living artists but allows broader “studio styles.” OpenAI spokesperson Taya Christianson highlighted the intention behind the new feature: enabling creativity while setting clear boundaries. Yet, artists like Karla Ortiz, who are suing AI companies over copyright infringement, feel differently. According to Ortiz and other artists cited in a recent U.S. Copyright Office study, using copyrighted works to train AI systems without permission is inherently unfair and financially damaging.
Legal experts question the specifics, debating if what AI replicates is a general style or detailed creative elements deserving protection. Josh Weigensberg, an intellectual property expert, mentions the complexities involved in distinguishing general styles from distinctive, protectable artistic expressions. He argues the matter is more nuanced than simply stating “style” is unprotectable under copyright, reflecting broader concerns shared by the creative community.
Users like Kouka Webb found joy and emotional comfort in creating Ghibli-style wedding images, especially during moments of nostalgia and personal significance. But even these positive experiences sparked criticism online from those advocating for human artists instead of algorithm-generated images.
Related story: 14% of Filipino workforce at risk of losing their jobs to AI. Here’s how to protect your career
Related story: AI relationships: Yay or nay?
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman acknowledged the unexpected popularity humorously, sharing his own Ghibli-styled portrait online. But beneath this humor, ongoing lawsuits from media entities like The New York Times highlight the complex and contentious relationship between AI technology and intellectual property rights.
As the debate continues, users are navigating a complicated intersection of admiration for beloved animation styles and respect for artistic originality. A recent paper published in the International Journal of Information Management emphasized the importance of proactively addressing these ethical concerns, suggesting multi-level policy interventions and clearer training practices for generative AI.
